Today's Judicial Dunce

You know what? This is becoming something of a joke. It seems that every time I hear of some activist federal judge making unconstitutional rulings, I cannot help but ask myself that one question which has so frequently become the obvious: Who appointed this idiot, the Peanut Peacenik or Slick Willy? As fate would have it, I was on the mark when I guessed it to be Slick Willy. At first, I was gonna flip a coin but found I hadn't any change in my pocket in the first place. Oh well?

Anyway, our latest judicial dunce, U.S. District Court Judge Ginger Berrigan, decided to rule against the constitutionally protected actions of the Tangipahoa School Board by declaring the prayer said at the beginning of every board meeting to be a violation of the establishment clause of the First Amendment. Of course, the lawsuit was filed but the Louisiana division of the ACLU (or the American Communist Lawyer Union, as I like to call ?em). Go figure.

This poor excuse for a scholar of law has some nerve continuing to arbitrate civil cases from a U.S. District Court bench let alone serve as a protector of the United States Constitution as it appears Judge Ginger has some questionable baggage of her own to be concerned about. There seems to be some conflicts of interest involving Her Royal Judgeship and Tulane University as I found on an interesting website by Dr. Carl Bernofsky where he lays out the reasons for why she should be censured.

That aside, I simply refuse to write another freakin? essay explaining why her ruling against the Tangipahoa School Board is an abomination of constitutional jurisprudence and grounds for impeachment, but I will go so far as to say that if we don?t get off our asses and raise hell with congress on passing effective legislation protecting the United States Constitution against these liberal activist judiciaries, we might just as well kiss those God given freedoms of ours bye-bye!