HAS THE ARMOR BEEN CRACKED???

IF THIS IS TRUE, AND TOO MANY FACTORS ARE INVOLVED FOR IT NOT TO BE, THIS STORY NEEDS TO GO VIRAL ACROSS THE WORLD TO EXPOSE THE MASSIVE FRAUD THAT HAS BEEN PERPETRATED ON ALL OF HUMANITY!!!

Climate Skeptics See 'Smoking Gun' in Researchers' Leaked E-Mails
Saturday, November 21, 2009
FOX News

Hackers broke into the servers at a prominent British climate research center and leaked years worth of e-mail messages onto the Web, including one with a reference to a plan to "hide the decline" in temperatures.

The Internet is abuzz about the leaked data from the University of East Anglia's Climate Research Unit (commonly called Hadley CRU), which has acknowledged the theft of 61MB of confidential data.

Climate change skeptics describe the leaked data as a "smoking gun," evidence of collusion among climatologists and manipulation of data to support the widely held view that climate change is caused by the actions of mankind. The authors of some of the e-mails, however, accuse the skeptics of taking the messages out of context, adding that the evidence still clearly shows a warming trend.

The files were reportedly released on a Russian file-serve by an anonymous poster calling himself "FOIA."

In an exclusive interview in Investigate magazine's TGIF Edition, Phil Jones, the head of the Hadley CRU, confirmed that the leaked data is real.

"It was a hacker. We were aware of this about three or four days ago," he told the magazine, noting that the center has yet to contact the police about the data breach.

*snip*

The Telegraph has posted some of the more scathing excerpts from these emails, which the newspaper suggests points to manipulation of evidence and private doubts about the reality of global warming, though the much of the scientific language in the e-mails is esoteric and hard to interpret.

*snip*

This is only the tip of a massive iceberg. The United Nations, Al Gore and many other globalist sycophants have been using fabricated scientific data to ram the fear of "global warming" down our throats for political gain and now we may have actual proof of their attempt at defrauding the entire civilized world.

As more and more evidence stacks up in defiance of the "global warming" myth, some are trying to get the word out and set the record straight...

New Documentary Challenges Gore's 'Inconvenient Truth' on Global Warming
Updated November 21, 2009
FOX News

In 2007, a British High Court judge ruled that Al Gore's global warming film contained nine significant errors and should no longer be screened in schools unless accompanied by guidance notes to balance Gore's "one-sided" views.

Al Gore's award-winning global warming film "An Inconvenient Truth," socked two years ago by a British court ruling that found several errors, is facing additional scrutiny with the release of a new documentary that seeks to rebut many of Gore's claims.

In Gore's film, directed by Davis Guggenheim and released in 2006, the former vice president argues that humans are causing climate change, a problem he says is the biggest moral challenge facing the globe.

If humans don't act to reduce their emissions of greenhouse gases, Gore contends, the deaths caused by climate change will double in 25 years to 300,000 people a year, and more than a million species worldwide could be driven to extinction in half a century.

The film went on to win Academy Awards for Gore and Guggenheim and to re-energize the environmental movement.

But in 2007, a British High Court judge ruled that Gore's film contained nine significant errors and should no longer be screened in schools unless accompanied by guidance notes to balance Gore's "one-sided" views.

The film's "apocalyptic vision" was not an impartial analysis of climate change, High Court Judge Michael Burton said, adding that the film is "substantially founded up scientific research and fact" but that the errors were made in "the context of alarmism and exaggeration."

Buoyed by the ruling, two Irish journalists -- Phelim McAleer and Ann McElhinney -- released a documentary in which they gather evidence outlining the damage of global warming hysteria. In "Not Evil Just Wrong," they challenge the claims made in Gore's film and conclude that the film is not worth screening in schools because it is shown there as "an article of science, not faith."

*snip*

I beg to differ with the title of their documentary. Not only is it "Wrong," but I contend that it is very much EVIL as well. Here's another good TV documentary, which was shown in England, that make a very similar argument. I beg you, please watch this video...

The Great Global Warming Swindle


Navitor69 | MySpace Video


To purchase the entire DVD, go to...
http://www.greatglobalwarmingswindle.co.uk/dvd.html

We could argue the science with these people until hell freezes over and it wouldn't make a damned bit of difference. The bottom line is that this whole charade has been nothing more than political and social warfare. It is about time the rest of this world wakes up form their hypnotized ignorance of common sense and revolts against those who seek world domination.