Confusion?Who should be the dunce today???

Ok, lemme get this straight? This U.S. District Judge Henry F. Floyd says that the President of the United States does not have the authority to indefinitely detain Abdullah Al Muhajir (aka Jose Padilla) without charging him for a crime, right? In his decision, Floyd said;

"...the court finds that the President has no power, neither express nor implied, neither constitutional nor statutory, to hold [Padilla] as an enemy combatant."

IMO, Padilla should not be permitted writ of habeas corpus for the simple fact that he has willfully associated himself with a hostile foreign enemy of the state with which we are actively engaged in combat, he had intentionally undergone terrorist training for the sole purpose of attacking our country and we had sufficient testimony with reason to believe that he was originally planning on detonating a nuclear ?dirty bomb? within our borders until those plans were scaled back to only blowing up apartment buildings that were supplied with natural gas. When the DOJ took this bad apple into custody we were shocked when we learned what he was planning to do.

An Amicus Curiae (friend of the court) brief filed by The Cato Institute On Writ Of Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For The Second Circuit appropriately argues the justification for Padilla?s detention as a military combatant and their ?Summary of Argument? correctly illustrates the President?s Executive Authority in this matter:

Since the September 11th terrorists attacks, the Federal Government has made several sweeping constitutional claims ? that the Executive can seize American citizens, place them in solitary confinement, deny any and all visitation (including with legal counsel), and, in effect, deny the prisoner access to Article III judges to seek the habeas ?discharge? remedy. As long as the Executive has issued ?enemy combatant? orders to his Secretary of Defense, the Government claims, the process comports with the Constitution ? regardless of whether the prisoner is an American citizen or whether the arrest-seizure takes place overseas or on American territory. Repeatedly, the Government conflates three distinct issues: seizure of citizens, imprisonment of citizens, and trial of citizens.

Another Amicus Curiae brief filed by The Commonwealth of Virginia On Writ Of Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For The Second Circuit also makes a strong argument in support of the President?s Executive Authority:

Given the unusual character of this war, it is appropriate for the judiciary to afford the President a measure of deference in the exercise of his executive authority and as Commander in Chief. When the U.S. military is sent abroad to vanquish terrorist training camps, soldiers have the authority to capture and detain both enemy personnel and their collaborators. This Court has never held that arrest warrants are required in the battlefield. Although the Government complains in general terms about attempts to ?impair? Executive authority, it notably fails to identify any legal challenge to the capture of enemy forces outside of America?s borders. The Government, in short, builds a convincing case against a classic straw man when it argues that the military must have latitude to seize combatants, including combatants who turn out to have been born in America.

What is more important here folks is that we cannot risk divulging sensitive information on activities and contacts of Jose Padilla for fear of compromising our intelligence sources and/or our military strategies. This is no different than what I said a month ago when U.S. District Court Judge Joyce Hens Green ruled that enemy combatants are protected under the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution during a time of war!

We cannot allow enemy military combatants to have access to classified information without risking disclosure of covert operations currently in process during this time of war! ?We are extracting valuable information from them about their potential roll in terrorist activity and we cannot afford to divulge sensitive information with the possibility that they will squeal like pigs to our enemies thereby jeopardizing the lives of those who are prosecuting this war on terror!!!

And so folks, I must admit that I am a bit confused today. I guess the real problem I?m having here is deciding who?s more deserving of the dunce cap; U.S. District Court Judge Henry F. Floyd or the nin-com-poop who appointed this non-constructionist nit-wit to a Federal Bench to begin with...... our very own beloved President George W. Bush!

Now there?s gratitude for ya!

I knew somethin' smelled around here!

Poor Oscar! There ain?t nuttin? worse than havin? unwanted garbage in your home. Nobody likes living with that kind of stench. Just remember though Oscar, it?s not nice to dump your garbage on your neighbor?s lawn.

The fight goes on!

I haven?t posted anything since the night before the last court hearing which ended up extending Terri?s life for another few weeks, but I have been keeping up on the latest developments and I must say that it brings a tear to my eye to see so many good folks out there who care enough about saving this woman?s life and are speaking out on the obvious sinister behavior being shown by Michael Schiavo, his lawyer, the Florida courts, the culture-of-death liberals and the MSM. So many of us truly breathed a hastened sigh of relief after hearing that Terri?s defenders would get until the middle of March to come up with enough evidence to stop that schmuck of a husband from yanking her tubes and letting her starve to death.

Amid all the good news and surreal optimism that I?ve been hearing over the past couple of days, nothing gave me more pleasure than an email I received from the good people over at RNC for Life. Here?s an eye witness account of a recent visit with Terri and her folks by Attorney Barbara Weller?

The February 24, 2005, Visit Narrative
by
Attorney Barbara Weller
I have visited Terri Schindler Schiavo several times since I first met her on the day before Christmas in 2004. Today was an especially poignant visit so I decided to again share it with all those who have been so concerned for her.


Attorney David Gibbs III and I visited Terri to update her on the good things that were happening in the legal case. We believe that she comprehends at some level what is going on and that she may well have been aware of the fear and anguish her parents and siblings were feeling on February 21 when the possibility existed that the process of starvation and dehydration might again be initiated leading to her death.


We made this visit with her mother and father, Bob and Mary Schindler. For the first time since I have been visiting her, security guards were posted by Terri?s door and visitors had to clear two check points before entering the room. The Schindlers are very grateful that Terri has been given this extra protection to keep her safe during this difficult time.


When Mr. Gibbs and I entered the room with Bob, Mary was already there. Terri was again sitting in her lounge chair, at nearly an upright angle. Mary was perched on the arm of the chair with her head right next to Terri?s head. Mary was talking to Terri and kissing her and Terri?s eyes were wide and locked onto her mother?s eyes. Mary was saying ?I love you? and trying to get Terri to repeat the words after her. Mary would say ?I-I-I-I? and Terri would answer back ?Aa-a-u-u-ugh.? Mary would then say ?l-o-o-o-v-v-v-v-e? and Terri would repeat ?Aw-w-w-w-w-w.? Mary then said a staccato ?you? to which Terri did not audibly respond.


Within a minute or two after we entered the room, Terri began to appear tired. She had been interacting with Mary for a half hour before we arrived and seemed to need a little rest. She closed her eyes while the four of us chatted. When Mary tried to get her attention, she would try to open her eyes, but they would flutter shut again. Mary was coaxing Terri to wake up, telling her that she had some ?very important visitors? (Mr. Gibbs and myself). Finally, after a few minutes of coaxing, Terri?s eyes opened wide again and she again locked them on her mother?s face.


After a few minutes, Mr. Gibbs began to talk to her. When Terri heard Mr. Gibbs' voice she became startled. She threw her head backwards and made a loud snorting sound. While Mr. Gibbs continued to talk to her she was opening and closing her eyes, sometimes looking in his direction and sometimes appearing to be resting. Mr. Gibbs told her about the good things that were happening, about all the people around the world who love her and who are praying for her, and that the government had stepped in to protect her and to try to help her. He stressed, like you would to a small child, how blessed Terri was to have a mom and dad who loved her. Terri seemed quite content listening to Mr. Gibbs speak.


I next took a turn to talk with Terri. I went to the spot where her mother had been and began to talk quietly to her about the party we are all going to have when she goes home. I also prayed with her. The whole time I was speaking to her and praying for her, her eyes were wide open and fixated on my face. At one point, she tried to talk with me, making a very quiet ?a-a-a-a-a? sound. I had the impression that my voice was perhaps somewhat familiar to her since I have now been to see her several times.


When her father went to stand by her side on Terri?s left, Mr. Gibbs had moved to her right, on the other side of Terri?s bed, which is next to her lounge chair. Earlier in Terri's room Bob had joked with Mr. Gibbs that everybody wanted to talk to Mr. Gibbs now and nobody cared what Bob had to say anymore making him jealous. Bob began to joke with Terri as he always does and Terri?s face took on the same coy, semi-annoyed look that I have seen before when she interacts with her father. At that point, Terri arched her back and turned her whole body to the right, away from Bob, to gaze intently at Mr. Gibbs with a little saucy smile on her face. It seemed obvious to me that she was playing along with the joke by giving her father the cold shoulder and focusing all her attention on Mr. Gibbs. Bob continued to tease with her about this for a few minutes and then gave her his customary hug and kiss, to which she responded with her usual lemon face that she reserves for his mustache kisses.


The four of us spent several more minutes joking and laughing together. Terri did not speak, but watched and listened to us. When it was time to go, Mary went up to Terri?s head to say goodbye. At that point Terri began to cry and to look very distressed. Mary said that Terri does not always cry when they leave, but she sometimes does. Mary promised that the whole family would return the next day, but Terri did not stop crying. When Mary left the room, I went up to Terri?s head and leaned close and told her that even though her mother and father could not always be with her that she was not alone. When I told her that, Terri widened her eyes again. She was no longer crying when I left the room.


This visit lasted about forty minutes. We encourage everyone to continue to pray for Terri and her family, especially that Terri will soon be receiving the help she needs to learn to speak and to swallow and that she will soon be home with her family again.

One Thing's For Sure...

I will NEVER be an anti-Zionist!

Today's Judicial Dunce

You know what? This is becoming something of a joke. It seems that every time I hear of some activist federal judge making unconstitutional rulings, I cannot help but ask myself that one question which has so frequently become the obvious: Who appointed this idiot, the Peanut Peacenik or Slick Willy? As fate would have it, I was on the mark when I guessed it to be Slick Willy. At first, I was gonna flip a coin but found I hadn't any change in my pocket in the first place. Oh well?

Anyway, our latest judicial dunce, U.S. District Court Judge Ginger Berrigan, decided to rule against the constitutionally protected actions of the Tangipahoa School Board by declaring the prayer said at the beginning of every board meeting to be a violation of the establishment clause of the First Amendment. Of course, the lawsuit was filed but the Louisiana division of the ACLU (or the American Communist Lawyer Union, as I like to call ?em). Go figure.

This poor excuse for a scholar of law has some nerve continuing to arbitrate civil cases from a U.S. District Court bench let alone serve as a protector of the United States Constitution as it appears Judge Ginger has some questionable baggage of her own to be concerned about. There seems to be some conflicts of interest involving Her Royal Judgeship and Tulane University as I found on an interesting website by Dr. Carl Bernofsky where he lays out the reasons for why she should be censured.

That aside, I simply refuse to write another freakin? essay explaining why her ruling against the Tangipahoa School Board is an abomination of constitutional jurisprudence and grounds for impeachment, but I will go so far as to say that if we don?t get off our asses and raise hell with congress on passing effective legislation protecting the United States Constitution against these liberal activist judiciaries, we might just as well kiss those God given freedoms of ours bye-bye!

I knew this was comming...

Senator Arlen Specter, well known RINO and Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee (well, for the meantime anyway) has begun issuing donk-style threats to Senator Majority Leader Bill Frist and his other fellow Republican Senators concerning the use of the ?nuclear option? which would effectively stop the Dimocrats from filibustering the President?s judicial nominees. Why am I not surprised?

In a Washington news conference yesterday, Specter warned the Republicans that?

"If we have a 'nuclear option,' the Senate will be in turmoil and the Judiciary Committee will be hell,"

Then he had the nerve to say?

"We can take an extended foreign trip, all of us."

Oh, really? You mean to tell me that if the Senate Republicans get fed up with the unconstitutional filibustering of the President?s judicial nominees by a bunch of whining donks, Specter along with the rest of the Senate Judiciary Committee will pull a move out of the Texas State Congressional Dimocrat playbook, run away from their appointed duties and hide in the sand when things don?t go their way? What the hell is he talking about?!

And then when questioned on his position on use of the "nuclear option", Specter said?

"I have not made a judgment on it. As I've said before, I'd prefer not to come to that bridge. I'm certainly not going to jump off the bridge until I come to it."

Didn?t we try to warn these guys over at the RNC that this thankless bastard wasn't going to help toe-the-line for GW?s judicial appointments despite the fact that the President bent over backwards and gave Specter the support he needed during last year?s run for Senator. And to think, with the Pennsylvanian Senatorial Primary results being so close last year, if GW threw his weight behind Pat Toomey instead, we could have been rid of that sad excuse of a Republican.

Benedict Snarlin' Arlen better get his jumpin' shoes on and someone should also make it clear to him that if the Republican majority says ?jump? and he doesn't, he might as well prepare to go down with that sinking ship known as the Democrat Party.

"Freedom Of Religion" not "Freedom From..."

A couple of days ago, Claire over at e-Claire/e-Biscuit.com commented on the "Action Alert" I posted with respect to an upcoming case where the U.S. Supreme Court will determine the constitutionality of displaying the 10 commandments on public property. In part, her comment said;

"How can anyone prevent anyone from displaying the 10 Comandments -- or the Torah or the Buddah or....."

Actually, depending on the Constitution of the individual State and not the Federal Government, that possibility may indeed exist, but what we also need to remember is that our country was founded on Judeo-Christian principles centered around the laws provided by God in the scripture of the Old Testament and not Buddha or Krishna or Gaia or Zeus or?

"I see the argument over using taxpayer money to fund a display of any of the above, but neither SCOTUS nor Congress has any say on any other such display any citizen may create."

?and on that, I couldn?t agree with her more.

United States Constitution ? Bill of Rights

Amendment I - Freedom of Religion, Press, Expression. Ratified December 15, 1791

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

The first part or the "establishment clause" of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution states; "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion?" Up until about a century ago, most folks clearly understood the meaning of those words. Congress has no constitutional authority to create legislation which establishes a federal religion. This was purposefully made the number one priority of the Founding Fathers because they didn?t want this new nation to be ruled by a governing body that mandated adherence to one particular form of Christianity as did the Church of England with its theocratic aristocracy. Each man needed to have the freedom to worship his creator in the way he saw fit without intervention from the federal government. Any and all laws pertaining to religious expression were intended to be the responsibility of each individual state. In fact, for several years following the ratification of the Bill of Rights, some states continued to maintain an established church.

Today, if you were to ask just about anyone on the street what the religion part First Amendment means, you will most assuredly hear something about the infamous "wall between church and state." Why? Because that is what?s being pushed by the MSM and the God-less public school system. The same revisionist historians that try to paint our Founding Fathers as a bunch of racist, slave-owning, homophobic, religious fanatics who slaughtered the native Indians and stole their land to build sweatshop factories spewing toxic waste that poisoned the wildlife and caused global warming are also the ones responsible for the on-going eradication of Christianity from the historical roots of American democracy.

Unfortunately, because of these radical secularists, there exists much confusion about who the Founding Fathers were and the building blocks they used to establish this great nation. As part of their relentless pursuit in removing all Christian identity from our government, they have scoured every historical source in the attempt to find anything they could use that would solidify their supposition on the absolute division between government and religion. Among various snippets of quotations that were purposefully taken out of context for their campaign of propaganda, one line from one historical document appeared to stand out above the rest.

On New Year?s Day in 1802, Thomas Jefferson penned the famous "church-state separation" letter in response to the Danbury Baptist Association?s concern over whether or not the new President would impose his theological preferences upon the rest of the nation. In it, he wrote;

Gentlemen, ? The affectionate sentiments of esteem and approbation which you are so good as to express towards me, on behalf of the Danbury Baptist Association, give me the highest satisfaction. My duties dictate a faithful and zealous pursuit of the interests of my constituents, and in proportion as they are persuaded of my fidelity to those duties, the discharge of them becomes more and more pleasing.

Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between man and his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legislative powers of government reach actions only, and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should ?make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,? thus building a wall of separation between church and State. Adhering to this expression of the supreme will of the nation in behalf of the rights of conscience, I shall see with sincere satisfaction the progress of those sentiments which tend to restore to man all his natural rights, convinced he has no natural right in opposition to his social duties.

I reciprocate your kind prayers for the protection and blessing of the common Father and Creator of man, and tender you for yourselves and your religious association, assurances of my high respect and esteem.

In the 1947 Supreme Court case of Everson v. Board of Education, Justice Hugo Black (a reputed Klansman and strong supporter of FDR?s socialist New Deal) chose to use Thomas Jefferson?s words on "separation of church and state" out of context for the purpose of bolstering his decision:

"The First Amendment has erected a wall between church and state. That wall must be kept high and impregnable. We could not approve the slightest breach."

By doing this he established an absolute definition of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment which drastically undermined the original intent of the framers and as a result laid the groundwork for future cases seeking to completely remove religious expression from the public venue.

The second part or the "free exercise" clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution clearly states that with regard to religion, Congress shall make no law "?prohibiting the free exercise thereof." This freedom is then backed up by the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution which states;

United States Constitution ? Bill of Rights

Amendment X - Powers of the States and People. Ratified December 15, 1791

The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State.

The Tenth Amendment ensures that legal jurisdiction over any function not granted to the federal government is forbidden and reserved explicitly for the individual states or the people. Since the "establishment clause" and the "free exercise clause" of First Amendment clearly prohibits the federal government from establishing or interfering in matters with regard to religion, each individual state is thereby vested with the responsibility of its own legislative action and judicial review.

In the case of Alabama Supreme Court Judge Roy Moore defying a federal court order to remove a display of the Ten Commandments from the Alabama courthouse, he held true to his oath of office and equally upheld the U.S. Constitution by refusing to allow the federal government to overstep its jurisdiction and render a legal decision on what is clearly a state issue.

When he took his oath of office, Chief Justice Moore swore to protect and uphold the Constitution of the State of Alabama in which the final version that was ratified in 1901 states;

"We, the people of the State of Alabama, in order to establish justice, insure domestic tranquility [sic], and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, invoking the favor and guidance of Almighty God, do ordain and establish the following Constitution and form of government for the State of Alabama"

In August of 2003, former American Ambassador Dr. Allen Keyes wrote a fabulous essay on Judge Moore and his appropriate interpretation of the First Amendment entitled "Standing for the Constitution" where he wrote;

In the state of Alabama, Judge Roy Moore has refused the unlawful order of Judge Myron Thompson, since it represents a destructive violation of the right of the people of Alabama to decide how their government will or will not express their religious beliefs. This right of the people is the first one secured in the U.S. Constitution's Bill of Rights, and it cannot be compromised without surrendering the moral foundations of republican liberty. Judge Thompson's assault upon this right, and that of the entire federal judiciary for the last several decades, is not, therefore, a trivial threat to the liberty of the people. Judge Moore cannot obey the court's order without surrendering that liberty.

Now, the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, as it applies the Bill of Rights to the states, lays an obligation upon state legislatures, officers and officials to refrain from actions that deprive the people of their rights. With respect to the First Amendment, therefore, it becomes their positive obligation to resist federal encroachments that take away the right of the people to decide how their state governments deal with matters of religion. This obviously has a direct bearing on the case of Chief Justice Roy Moore in his confrontation with the abusive order of Judge Myron Thompson.

His refusal of the order is not only consistent with his duty to the Alabama Constitution, it is his duty under the Constitution of the United States. Alabama Attorney General Bill Pryor, the eight associate justices of the Alabama Supreme Court, and indeed any other state officials in Alabama who submit to the judge's order are, by contrast, in violation of the federal Constitution, as well as their duty to the constitution and people of Alabama.

Justice Myron Thompson and the justices of the Eleventh U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals broke their oaths of office, overstepped their jurisdiction and as a result became subject to impeachment. Their actions were clearly an affront on constitutional jurisprudence as their arrogant disregard for the First and Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution is nothing short of an act of treason.

Setting aside the numerous legalities of this argument, I feel that it is our duty fight as individuals and as a nation to restore the religious heritage of our country?s founding?s. The men who fought to secure our God given freedoms were nearly all Christian men who paid for it with their own blood. Our nation was not built on the religious principles of the Hindus or the Buddhists or the Mohammedans or the Atheists, but on the foundation of laws prescribed to us by the God of Abraham which were handed down to Moses on Mount Sinai. Our country?s historical establishment as well as our blessings of freedom and liberty are rooted deep in Biblical Scripture, The Ten Commandments and The Gospel of Jesus Christ. To deny it for selfish desire is pure folly and contrary to the vision of our country?s Founding Fathers and to prohibit public recognition of our Biblical heritage is to remove the backbone from our very existence.

In August of 2003, Howard Phillips, Founder of the Constitution Party wrote in an essay titled "Who is America's Sovereign";

"Those who framed our great Constitution acknowledged that, as God's creatures, we must hold the Federal government accountable to us, so that, as God's stewards, we can be accountable to Him."

AMEN BROTHER PHILLIPS, AMEN!

As we pray for Terri...

What is perhaps most notable here above all is the outrage we share over the fact that the culture of death has indeed taken over so many in the judicial system and I believe it to be a direct result of the anti-Christian humanist movement. Given all the overwhelming evidence that Terri is far from being a brain-dead vegetable on life support and the deafening cries from the conscience of our nation, there continues to be force of evil that insists on carrying out this heinous crime. Even if this defenseless individual is murdered, we will continue our fight to remove this culture of death from our society and restore the culture of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness for all!

Please visit BlogsforTerri.com for ongoing updates and news related to the battle for Terri's life.



*UPDATE* BlogsForTerri.com has also set up an emergency fund raising drive to help offset the legal costs involved in keeping the fight for Terri's life alive in the courts. Please make a financial contribution to help save Terri and please be as generous as your means would permit.

PLEASE GO HERE TO MAKE A FINANCIAL CONTRIBUTION...

Our prayers continue to be with Terri and her family at this terrible time of desperation.

Terri's 11th hour...

There?s a great commentary by Bonnie Chernin Rogoff over at GOPUSA this morning that just echoes the sentiments I have for this Michael Schiavo character. It?s a great read as it brings more attention to the question of who Michael Schiavo really is, what his involvement in Terri?s tragic condition was, and what exactly this guy stands to gain by pulling the plug on this poor disabled woman. From what I gather, tomorrow is the moment of truth. February 22, 2005 was to be the earliest day that Michael Schiavo would try to have Terri?s feeding tube removed. With so many rallying to save this woman?s life, one must wonder why this schmuck continues to insist on her death.

ConservativePetitions.com wants to petition Governor Jeb Bush to intervene once again to save the life of Terri Schindler-Schiavo. Please add your name to the petition in this last minute plea for Terri.

PLEASE GO HERE TO SIGN THEIR PETITION...

ACTION ALERT

HELP FIGHT FOR PUBLIC DISPLAY OF THE 10 COMMANDMENTS!!!

On March 6, the U.S. Supreme Court will determine the
constitutionality of publicly displaying the Ten Commandments.
This decision will most certainly greatly affect our rights as
citizens to publicly acknowledge God.

Unless the believers of our nation rise up, we will essentially be
throwing open the door for rampant secularism in our land. That is why in the days leading up to the hearing, Faith and Action
seeks to rally and mobilize 50,000 citizens who support the Ten
Commandments.

Having already filed an Amicus Brief with the Supreme Court,
Faith and Action is at the forefront of the Ten Commandment
debate. With their offices just a few feet from the U.S. Supreme
Court, they are perfectly situated to lead the grassroots charge to
protect and preserve our religious liberty and heritage.

PLEASE GO HERE TO SIGN THEIR PETITION...

!!!!!! BASTARDS !!!!!!

1000 moonbats to make it wrong...

1 Marine to make it right!

Guess who's been hard at work...

...squeezing out important legislation.

Our beloved Queen Shrillary has gained some backing from her fellow liberal constituents on a piece of sh** legislation that would allow convicted felons the right to vote. Wait? lemme rephrase that? legislation that would make it legal for droves of convicted felons to show up at the polls and vote for donks. Go figure. I liken this to telling your child that from here on out, they won?t get a spankin? for raidin? the cookie jar. Shrillary and the rest of the donks have the mindset of dysfunctional parents who think their kids should be allowed to get away with raiding the cookie jar because they?re just misunderstood.

Felony crimes are offenses that are deemed by law to be the most socially destructive actions and are therefore deserving of the harshest penalties. Those convicted of such offenses are stripped of their civil liberties and likewise should loose their voting rights as a means of preventing them from electing individuals to political office that may seek to undermine the safety of our society by softening laws on felony crime. It?s pure common sense here folks and not all states have the common sense enough to recognize this threat, but because of the fact that liberals are typically a bunch of Freudian Dr. Spock worshipers who think that it?s counter-productive to spank children who refuse to stop raiding the cookie jar, our communities will continue to remain at risk.

Every election we end up dealing with the same old crap; liberals dragging felons and dead people out to the polls (multiple times in some cases), liberals buying votes with crack (remember that?) and liberals doing everything they can to disenfranchise the Republican leaning military vote. When the hell is this insanity going to stop?! This proposed legislation is pure excrement folks. We don?t need to have our communities endangered by lax laws at the voting booth. On the contrary, as a safe and peaceable society what we need are more affective voting laws and more diligent enforcement of existing regulations in order to validate the legitimacy of each and every vote.

ACTION ALERT

STAND UP FOR OUR TROOPS!!!

Well before the outrageous accusations against out country?s finest by CNN?s Eason Jordan were spread across the blogosphere, we have been well aware of how the MSM seeks to smear the image of U.S. soldiers before the eye?s of the world during this and past times of war. One good example is the obsession the MSM is having with the murder charges brought against Marine Second Lieutenant Ilario Pantano. This rediculous fishing expidition will only end up putting our soldiers in greater danger because they will be forced into second guessing their decisions during potentially life threatening situations, but this seems to be what these free speech back-stabbers want!

Their malicious abuse of this country?s First Amendment right to free speech is nothing short of treasonous and as benefactors of this great freedom, paid for by the blood of countless thousands of brave men and women in the Armed Forces, it is our obligation to defend their good name and fight to win the war of words on the home front. These socialist utopians need a wake up call and we in the blogosphere have the acknowledged voice to give it to ?em!

Remember that Super Bowl commercial I lauded last week? Well there appears to be more to the reality of that story than many in the MSM choose to report about. There?s a story in the Agape Press that echoes the sentiment expressed by most Americans who are endearingly grateful of the freedoms we have and grateful for those who protect that freedom. Too bad we don?t hear more stories like that in the MSM. You would think that with all the real support our troops get from American media consumers, they would change their smug arrogant ways for the sake of their ratings, but noooooooooo!

The American Family Association has started an email campaign with the hopes of making our voices heard. We are sick of the bad-mouthing our military gets from the MSM and we, as consumers of their biased reporting, refuse to support them and their anti-American propaganda!

PLEASE GO HERE TO JOIN THE CAMPAIGN...

Speaking of Art Bell...

Yesterday when I saw the Iranian UFO report, I checked over at Coast to Coast AM?s website to see is if George Noory and Art Bell (purveyors of the paranormal) had anything else to add to the story. While browsing around their site I found a hilarious audio clip of some guy talking on the phone to an answering machine when all of a sudden he sees a car accident and begins to narrate the scuffle which later ensues. When I first heard this, I damned near fell off my chair LMAO. Enjoy?

Real Player or Win Media

Moral of the story: Don?t piss off a carload of little old ladies. They may prove to be more dangerous than little green men in flying saucers.

Where the hell is Art Bell?!

It appears that the Iranian government has been having some security problems with UFOs recently. According to an article off an Indian news site, every time the Iranians try to intercept these UFOs, they either fail to keep up with the things or they are incapable of tracking them. This wild speculation may well be justified if not for the fact that Iran had previously given the U.S. permission to conduct "fly-overs" within its airspace.

Well, this morning brings news of an unknown explosion in Iran that is leaving many wondering ?what the heck is going on over there?? Are the Israelis attacking Iran?s nuclear sites? Is the U.S. involved? Are the Iranians staging the explosion as a means of creating the illusion that they are victims of western aggression? Perhaps they?re under attack by little green men in flying saucers. First, the Iranian government denied there being any explosion at all. Then, withing hours they issued a statement calling the explosion nothing more than construction related. The world may never know.

However, what is of significant interest is a report by the BBC that announces Iran and Syria?s plan on them combining their efforts to "confront threats" against their countries. This comes as no big surprise as we?ve know since the rise of the insurgency in Iraq that militants and terrorists from both of these countries have been hell-bent on bringing death and destruction to our liberating forces and the good citizens of Iraq. In addition to this renewed threat to Western forces of freedom, Iran makes clear its intentions of shooting down any surveillance aircraft spying on them.

My advice to the Iranian Mullahs is not to piss off those little green men in their flying saucers or they just might wake up one morning to find their nuke facilities and other significant military targets turned into glowing glass parking lots.

Git 'er dun!!!

Here we go folks! Set yer TiVos up fer CSPAN and grab yer popcorn! It?s time to put an end to the Libs and their unconstitutional filibustering of GW?s judicial nominees! Doc Frist and the DC packeys ain?t takin any crap this time around. Let those whiners like Reid, Pelosi, Byrd, Kerry and Kennedy try to play their infantile games on the Senate floor now. Once the Republicans drop the a-bomb, you?re gonna witness temper tantrums on the left like you've never seen in your entire life!

WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!

GW just sent 20 previously filibustered judicial nominees back to the Senate for an up-or-down vote and this time he means business.

Here?s the list straight from the White House.

This is gonna be more fun than watchin? rodeos on RFD-TV!!!

YEEEEEEEEHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAWWWWWWWWWWW!!!!!!!!!!

Also in the news today...

Today marks a very sorrowful day for millions of faithful Catholics and the silence in the news on the passing of Sister Lucia de Jesus dos Santos is deafening. Apart from a story listed by Reuters news service and posted by Michael Brown of Spirit Daily, there is no coverage otherwise in the MSM on the death of the last surviving seer of the Miracle of the Sun at Fatima, Portugal on October 13, 1917 where, before tens of thousands of onlookers ? believers and atheists alike ? the sun twirled and danced around the sky in an aural array of streaming beautiful colors. Sister Lucy was also well known as the sole currier of the famed Third Secret of Fatima which foretold of the rise and fall of Communism and the attempted assassination on the life of Pope John Paul II.

Not since the death of Mother Teresa of Calcutta has there been such a significant event in the history of Catholic Church. However, unlike Mother Teresa, Sister Lucy was a Carmelite nun where according to their traditions they lead a very cloistered life of prayer and devotion to Christ. None-the-less, she was world renowned for her direct involvement in the most famous miracle of the twentieth century, the receiver of several prophetic visions and the holder of the much sought after Third Secret given to her by the Blessed Virgin. So famous was she that even Mel Gibson went out of his way to get her a private screening of his blockbuster film "The Passion of the Christ."

As Michael Brown pointed out in his article, how befitting that she was taken from this world on the thirteenth of the month? the same day of the month where for several months during 1917, Mary appeared and spoke to three little children in a field at Fatima.

Now that's foul!

I?ve heard something about this in the past and when I saw this little ditty, I almost wanted to puke. Some radical group of sexual degenerates decided that they needed to justify their immoral behavior by likening their sick and unnatural habits to a bunch of flightless migratory male water foul kept in captivity without a sufficient number of sexually active females. Like, DUH! What the heck do you expect is going to happen? You think that Tux is gonna go ask the zoo keeper if he can run out to the penguin marital aid store and pick up a vibrator for the missus? Howzabout him gettin' the zoo keeper to reply to some of the spam email he gets selling Viagra? Maybe, since Valentine?s Day is coming up, he should get her a nice bucket of minnows, some caviar bon-bons and a pretty heart shaped greeting card.

Whatever the case, this is homosexual activism gone berserk. Animals are just what they are? ANIMALS, for crying out loud! They don?t have the cognitive reasoning capabilities that humans do. Animals are driven by survival based instinct which precludes them from making the distinction between moral and immoral sexual activity. Humans, on the other hand, were blessed by God with the free will to choose good over evil. We were given an explicit set of instructions on how to conduct ourselves in this life and if you don?t like it because it doesn?t comply with your selfish desires, then too bad! It?s been proven throughout history that decadence and debauchery are tickets to catastrophe. Deviant sexual behavior of any kind is intrinsically evil. It is brought about by one?s mental desire to break away from normally programmed behavior and goes against the natural progression of our species. So don?t even try to sell me a bunch of junk science that attempts to categorize homosexuality as some kind of biological anomaly ?cause I ain?t buying it!

Honestly folks, what people do behind closed doors is none of my business and each man has a responsibility to maintain the purity of his own soul. I have a great amount of compassion for those who are trapped by the snares of the devil and I am far from being a saint, but I refuse to live by a philosophy of moral relativism. If you choose to bring your misbehaviors into the public domain and try to teach my children that black and white morality has "acceptable" shades of gray, I will call you out for what you are and demand that God?s truth be told.

A blogosphere firestorm for Terri!!!

I'm feeling a tremendous need to put out another update on the Terri Schiavo case. There appears to be a real growing interest in saving this woman?s life given that she may only have two more weeks left to live. The blogosphere is abuzz with talk of how the courts are continually siding with her husband and the pro-life community is signaling yet another call to arms. Even Dr. James Dobson of Focus on the Family, Pope John Paul II himself and the Christian community at large have called for the preservation of her life. As time runs out on this poor woman, a firestorm is brewing on the internet demanding that she be kept alive and more attention be given to an investigation looking into possible abuse at the hands of her husband. The case has also drawn attention to the fact that there are many in the government legal system that refuse to side on pro-life issues. Just this past week, a judge refused to retract his decision allowing Michael Schiavo to remove Terri?s feeding tube which would subject her to an excruciating death by starvation. Despite the news that studies show disabled people like Terri are indeed mentally aware and the promise that miracles really do happen, we need to do all we can to get the message out to others in the blogosphere that Terri?s death would be no less than a tragic injustice to decency, the respect of life and overall human compassion.

Once again, for more information on Terri?s fight and ways that you can help, visit www.terrisfight.org. Your prayers and petitions are needed and appreciated.

Mistaken Identity?

rollover fun:)

TNX Claire!

Reflection

Yesterday was Ash Wednesday and it marks the beginning of Lent for Catholics worldwide. It?s a time for spiritual reflection, fasting (denying one?s self of daily pleasures) and atonement for offences to God. Being a practicing Catholic, I begin the Lenten season by receiving a mark of the Cross on my forehead with the ashes of last years Easter palms largely as a symbolic gesture of mourning and penance and to remind me that from ashes my physical existence has come and to ashes my physical remains shall return. It is my soul that shall carry on in the hereafter and therefore I need to seek forgiveness from God and bear focus on the well-being of my soul in remembrance of the suffering that Christ endured for the sake my sin.

As the day came to pass, I could not help but feel sadness in my heart as I made my daily rounds on the web. Everywhere I look I saw sadness, depression, poverty, hunger, war, natural disasters and vice on a scale so unprecedented that it causes many to contemplate weather or not we are living in the run-up to the final days. The events that have been streaming across the news wires have given much rise to speculation that even bigger tragedies are right around the corner. Now don?t get me wrong here; I?m not at all trying to sound pessimistic. In fact I?m very much a ?glass-half-full? kinda guy. Even in the worst of times I can take comfort in my faith that there is a better place beyond this dimension that awaits me and all those who believe in Him.

Let me give you just a few examples on what I?m talking about here from the news over the past few days. The Pope was 10 minutes from death as he was rushed to the hospital last week, the terrorists and their supportive r駩mes are moving ever closer toward acquiring nuclear weapons, North Korea already has them, Abbas and Sharon are actually talking serious about peace in the Holy Land which may well result in the feared split of Jerusalem, Russia is going to supply the know terrorist haven of Syria with arms, the sanctity of marriage is under attack and now the mother of all abominations, the British government gives the creator of Dolly the sheep a license to clone human life for medical research!

*Sigh!*

What could possibly be next?

Birds of a feather...

This should come as no big surprise to most of you...

According to anti-USA Today, the anti-American professor Ward Churchill is being backed up in court by the ACLU. This communist pack of legal extortionists are just as evil as the garbage they choose to defend in our nation's courts. Up until now the one banner I forgot to put up on my website was one promoting the absolute destruction of the ACLU.

Well, I've waited long enough!

Today's Judicial Ace

Here?s a change from my usual focus on judicial idiots. I?d like to draw your attention to a lawyer who knows constitution law better than anyone else I know. Mark Levin, president of Landmark Legal Foundation, is known by loyal listeners of WABC Radio in New York as "The Great One" or "Dr. Levin." Rush Limbaugh even refers to him as "F. Lee Levin" (although I have absolutely no idea why). If you?ve heard this guy?s radio monologues and experienced how he goes after the loony left, you already know that he?s a staunch conservative bulldog. His program often focuses on the legal issues that impact our government and society which is undoubtedly the most important front on the war against the forces of liberal madness. He?s one of Sean Hannity?s best friends and broadcasts his show every week night following Sean from 6:00 to 8:00pm EST. If you want to learn more about him or hear clips from his show, I suggest you visit the unofficial Mark Levin Fan Weblog.

Mark has just published an excellent book on how the Supreme Court is destroying our country. Now, I?m not here to make any money on this as I refuse to have any type of paid advertisements on my website, but "Men in Black" is one book that I just have to hawk. In it, Mark reviews the history behind the most dangerous branch of our government and he accurately points out the problems that liberal activist judiciaries pose to our Constitutional existence. He correctly points out that federal justices have little accountability, need to be subject to term limits and must be prevented from legislating law from the bench. This book is a definite must-read and I encourage everyone who cares about the direction of our country to buy it and read it. I?m sure you know of several good places to purchase a book of this caliber and therefore I will not bother endorsing any one retailer.

It's a wrap. Now gimme a hanky!

This year?s Super Bowl turned out to be pretty good. I must admit that I was rooting for Philly, but I must also admit that I was not too disappointed with the final results. I thought that New England put up one hell of a fight. Philly couldn?t produce interceptions or defensive sacs and then it appeared that they just gave up in the last minutes of the game. I hope they feel all proud of themselves today as peeps give em' the thumb and index finger in the shape of an "L" on the forehead salute.

The halftime show was like a complete flipside of last year?s freak show in that I almost fell asleep during McCartney?s near plastic performance with those stupid looking make-believe cigarette lighter lights at the end of his performance. Boy, you better bet those Super Bowl folks were real careful not to piss off the FCC this year.

Now, just like many others, I took some interest in the commercials that the various companies spent millions of dollars on for each minute of air-time. Some were kinda funny, some were kinda stupid and some were a little over the top, but one commercial stood out among the rest and from what I read this morning, there was at least another blogger out there that felt the same way. Michelle Malkin has great taste (if not in beer then definitely in advertisements). She correctly pointed out what many of us patriotic Americans already knew to be the Best Super Bowl Ad of them all! Anheuser-Busch ran a great advertisement saluting our brave warriors and their efforts. When I saw it, it actually brought me to tears. If you missed it, when you see it, you will know what I?m talking about.

Go here to see it for yourself...

Good riddance!

I thought we?d been through this crap before. Remember, after GW beat the daylights outta Senator Flip-Flop back in November? Wasn?t that when a bunch of lefties suffering from PEST just had to make yet one more ridiculous statement by fleeing to Canada? OMG, give it freakin? break already. If they gotta get outta here that bad they had better be serious about it. Don?t be like that pansy Peter Jennings and take on a dual citizenship. Stop at the border, renounce your citizenship and get your pathetic moonbat asses out of our country for good! You people are nothing but a canker sore to our society and we?d be so much better off without ya!

Sheesh!

As we remember the Gipper...

As we pause on football's holiest day to commemorate the birthday of one of the nations greatest and most beloved presidents, let?s take a moment to fully appreciate how fortunate we are to be citizens of this beautiful country in which we live. Apart from the daily struggles we find ourselves in with the WOT, the endless political wrangling, the constant assault on our national sovereignty, the increased loosening of our society's moral values and the ongoing fight to preserve the vision of our founding fathers, we do have much to be grateful for.

Every morning when I wake up, I thank God for the blessings I've been given. I have a roof over my head, clothes to keep me warm, food to keep me from hunger and a job to support my family. I have a loving family that gives me the emotional support I need to succeed in this troubled world. I have the freedom to live wherever I want, own property and choose my livelihood. I have the freedom and the ability to educate myself and my children in the way I see fit. I have the freedom to own a gun to protect myself and my family from those who wish us harm. I have the privilege of living in a country that offers the opportunity for every man and woman to become the best they can be. I live in a country that allows moonbats to gather in large numbers to protest our country?s resolve to defeat evil and allows me the freedom to stand in front of them and publicly expose them for the clueless freaking idiots that they are. And I have the freedom to express my political and social frustrations in this forum known as the blogosphere.

Perhaps no one else in recent memory can better exemplify that humble gratitude for freedom better than the late great Ronald Reagan. It is certainly inspiring to see how a small boy from rural Illinois can grow up to become a football player, a radio sports caster, a famous actor and President of the greatest nation on earth. Ronald Reagan was much more than just a symbol of freedom, he was also a shining spirit of righteous determination, human will and success. He was a man that saw optimism where many saw doubt. He lead his country by doing what was right and not necessarily what would generate popularity. He fought to spread democracy into regions of the world where many thought it to be impossible and he believed that we were the shining city on the hill for the whole world to see as the example of liberty and freedom for all.

And so while we take part in the festivities this Super Bowl Sunday, revel in the excitement of the grid-iron battle and cheer for our team to win the title of Champion, take heart in the fact that we are truly blessed. We have so much to be grateful for and so much to be optimistic about. While there are many of life?s issues out there that need to be resolved, if we choose to continue in his spirit by committing ourselves to struggle for what?s right in government and society, then on this day, we will certainly be winning one for the Gipper.

Today's Judicial Dunce

Yes, boys and girls, it?s time once again for an educational segment on runaway activist judiciaries!

Today we focus our ire on the great blue state of New York (*cough* my home base).

According to a report from CNS News, New York State Supreme Court Justice Doris Ling-Cohan decided that New York State?s Domestic Relation Laws were unconstitutional and because the wording does not provide equal treatment for those in same-sex relationships. "The words 'husband', 'wife', 'groom' and 'bride', as they appear in the relevant sections of the Domestic Relations Law are and shall be construed to mean 'spouse', and all personal pronouns, as they appear in the relevant sections of the Domestic Relations Law, are and shall be construed to apply equally to either men or women."

Hmmmm? Let?s see what our good friend Noah Webster has to say about this?

HUS'BAND, n. s as z.


1. A man contracted or joined to a woman by marriage. A man to whom a woman is betrothed, as well as one actually united by marriage, is called a husband. Lev.19. Deut.22.


2. In seaman's language, the owner of a ship who manages its concerns in person.

3. The male of animals of a lower order.


4. An economist; a good manager; a man who knows and practices the methods of frugality and profit. In this sense, the word is modified by an epithet; as a good husband; a bad husband. [But in America, this application of the word is little or not at all used.]


5. A farmer; a cultivator; a tiller of the ground. [In this sense, it is not used in America. We always use husbandman.]


HUS'BAND, v.t. To direct and manage with frugality in expending any thing; to use or employ in the manner best suited to produce the greatest effect; to use with economy. We say, a man husbands his estate, his means or his time.


He is conscious how ill he has husbanded the great deposit of his Creator.


1. To till; to cultivate with good management.


2. To supply with a husband. [Little used.]




WIFE, n. plu. Wives. [G., a woman.]


1. The lawful consort of man; a woman who is united to man in the lawful bonds of wedlock; the correlative of husband.
The husband of one wife. 1 Timothy 3.

Let every one of you in particular, so love his wife even as himself, and let the wife see that she reverence her husband. Ephesians 5.


2. A woman of low employment; as strawberry wives. [Not in use.]


GROOM, n.


1. A boy or young man; a waiter; a servant.


2. A man or boy who has the charge of horses; one who takes care of horses or the stable.


3. In England, an officer of the king's household; as the groom of the chamber; groom of the stole or wardrobe.


4. Groom for goom, in bridegroom, is a palpable mistake.


BRIDE, n.


1. A woman new married.

But the name is applied to a woman at the marriage festival, before she is married, as well as after the ceremony.


2. A woman espoused, or contracted to be married. The case of Lewellyn, prince of Wales. Henry's Hist.of Britain, B.iv.ch.i.,sect.2. [This is the true original sense of the word.]

Where the hell does this lunatic get off deciding that these terms are to be replaced with the word spouse?

SPOUSE, n. [L., to engage.] One engaged or joined in wedlock; a married person, husband or wife. We say of a man, that he is the spouse of such a woman; or of a woman, she is the spouse of such a man.

First of all, without even getting into the moral implications of allowing same-sex marriage, this genius decides that she has the legitimate right to change the text within established law from the bench in order to reflect her own personal views. Judges are given the power to decide on cases based on established law and do not have constitutional authority to create or modify the law. That is a duty reserved for the legislative branch of government. This is the reason why we have separation of powers. IMO, Justices who attempt to rewrite established law from the bench should be immediately disbarred.

Yes my friends, I am one step closer to gathering up the goslings and getting the flock outta NYS.

How low can they go?

Anybody that sees this picture should be faced with the difficulty of deciding weather or not to express laughter or outrage. Unlike the silly pictures of "Evil Bert" this picture more closely describes the barbaric and disgusting tactics being used by a group of sub-humans the MSM chooses to label as "rebels" or "freedom fighters" or "resistance". Regardless of the idiotic PC titles these retarded liberal bastards give to this bunch of animals, there are some basic decencies which combatants of war are expected to adhere to in the field of engagement. Obviously some folks just refuse to take note of that when it comes to a potential military defeat for American capitalist Nazis with their oil driven desires of global imperialism.

The enemy we?ve been fighting in the WOT clearly does not choose to respect any of the honorable rules of conventional warfare. From day-one, they have demonstrated that their military tactics are as unconventional as any in the history of world. They have absolutely no regard for the innocent and knowing that we, as a civilized people, go out of our way to protect those not engaged in combat, they purposely employ the tactics of barbarism in the attempt to accomplish that what they know is impossible to begin with. Also, you don?t need to be a brilliant military analyst to figure out that these monsters are using the same sick battle strategies employed by the VC during the Vietnam War. The only difference here is that these sick bastards are fighting for a perverted religious ideology instead of a political one.

They fly jets full of unsuspecting passengers into our buildings, they kidnap and chop the heads off of innocent civilians, they blow up car bombs in busy public centers, they use intimidation and fear to project their power and control over the helpless, they raise their children to become puppets of death and now they?ve stooped so low as to use the mental and physical handicapped as walking bombs.

For the MSM and the kook liberal left to continue referring to these murderous, bloodthirsty, Islamo-fascist, barbaric savages as anything less than what they are - "TERRORISTS" ? is both factually irresponsible and a purposeful and direct act of open hostile aggression toward the good and honorable name of the United States of America!

Some things are just so wrong!

I absolutely refuse to go into the details here, butt I've gotta say that this is, by far, the most ass-backwards method of alcohol abuse that I have ever heard of...

TNX Matt Drudge!

ACTION ALERT

Show your commitment to a culture of life!!!

With a decidedly pro-life Congress, and a noticeable shift in climate for the unborn, Grassfire is moving aggressively to intensify grassroots momentum in support of a number of key pieces of legislation?most notably The Unborn Child Pain Awareness Act that was just re-introduced to Congress, and has an excellent change of passage!


In order to maximize grassroots impact on leadership during petition presentations, it is vital that we mobilize as many pro-life voices from around the nation as soon as possible! Please sign the petition below and continue to alert your pro-life friends and family.


The "Petition For Life" focuses on a number of key pro-life initiatives that we are pressing House and Senate leadership on:
- Passage of the Unborn Child Pain Awareness Act (S. 51, HR 356).
- Blocking the dangerous RU-486 abortion drug.
- A true, universal ban on all forms of human cloning, including human embryo cloning.

- Stopping federal funding of research that destroys human embryos.
- Stopping taxpayer support of Planned Parenthood?an organization that performed 227,385 abortions in the fiscal year of 2002-2003, while during that same time referred only 1,963 women to adoption services.
- Protecting babies who survive abortions.
- Prohibiting the taking of minors across state lines to have an abortion (S. 851, HR 1218).
- Support of pro-life nominees to the Court.

GO HERE TO SIGN THE PETITION...

WAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!

"George Bush is a meanie!"

"He's not letting us have

our way!"

"He's not sharing with us!"

"IT'S NOT FAIR!"

"WAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!"

- The Democrat rebuttal to President George Bush?s State of the Union Address

Preparing for the temper tantrums?

Here we are on the eve of the President?s State of the Union Address and the media is abuzz with expectations of seeing George Bush patting himself on the back and touting his unrealistic plans for social security and the war on terror. They expect him to voice more of his continued arrogance and unwillingness to compromise with the minority donks in congress and they will be eager to pick his speech apart for sound bites that they can later use to castigate him on his future policy decisions. Likewise, the donks will be livid in their pre and post address rebuttals, criticizing the President on every possible issue including the brand of toilet paper he uses to wipe his ass. These partisan vultures are so wrapped up in their hatred for George Bush that I will be so bold as to predict the exact spoiled child-like behavior they will exhibit this evening during his address.

- Most of those on the left will not rise to applaud the President as he enters the room.

- They will refuse to applaud the President on most if not all of his accomplishments.

- The same disrespectful scumbags will scowl, wring their hands, roll their eyes and shake their heads in disgust over every policy issue the President covers.

- Their whining echoes will be amplified in the MSM as we see the focus during the applause shift from those lauding the President to those who are clearly showing their anger and disapproval.

Bottom line... we are going to see a political temper tantrum unlike any we?ve seen since? since? well, now come to think of it, since last year?s State of the Union Address. Only now with so many more victories on the side of GW, these pathetic examples of pettiness are just fit to be tied.

Personally, I think they should get a good spanking and be sent right to bed without dinner!

Well, it could be worse...

According to the AP, Kofi decided to put Slick Willy in charge of U.N. tsunami relief efforts. No doubt this was done largely as a symbolic gesture in his attempt to make nice with the U.S. as we get close to exposing him for the piece of trash he truly is and driving the final nail in the coffin of his failed career. Also, there could well have been some back door dealings by the Slick One offering his up his defense of Kofi in exchange for receiving the grooming he needs prior to taking over as head of the U.N. (and you all know that's coming)

Oh well, speaking from a humanitarian standpoint with respect to all those who drowned in that tragic disaster, I guess it could be worse...

Kofi could have put Ted Kennedy in charge.

Today's one word commentary...

DUH!!!